Model of formation of quality of banknote production on the offset printing stage

  1. Home
  2. Archive
  3. № 1 (75)
Author(s) Collection number Pages Download abstract Download full text
Klymenko T. Ye., Kyrychok T. Yu., Talimonova N. L. № 1 (75) 11-18 Image Image

A conceptual hierarchical model for the formation of the quality of banknote production at the offset printing stage has been developed, in which the quality criteria that are subject to automated control during the initial control of finished products and the control of wear and tear have been highlighted.

The use of a conceptual hierarchical model for ensuring the quality of banknote production at the stage of offset printing, taking into account automated sorting, enables to make a thorough analysis of causative phenomena in order to ensure the conformity of the quality of banknotes with certain criteria.

A conceptual hierarchical model for forming the quality of offset printing based on automated sorting has been created, which enables to ensure the accuracy of the control of banknotes wear and the ability to control this process by establishing the acceptable standards of wear indicators and adjusting the sorting equipment. The quality criteria of offset printing have also been systematized, taking into account the development of technologies for the production of protected products.

The suggested model sets forth the quality criteria that are subject to automated control during the initial control of finished products and the control of wear and tear, which makes it possible to purposefully establish the directions of quality assurance of offset printing, to carry out the input control of materials, the initial control of finished products and to adjust the process of control of banknotes wear.

Keywords: banknote, offset printing, quality control, wear control, quality criteria, hierarchy analysis method.


  • Kyrychok, T. Yu. (2014). Znosostiikist banknotnoi produktsii. Kyiv : NTUU «KPI» (in Ukrai­nian).
  • de Heij, H. A. M. (2010). Banknote design for retailers and public: DNB Occasional Studies. 2010. Vol. 8/No.4. De Nederlandsche Bank NV, Amsterdam. 255 p. (in English).
  • de Heij, H. A. M. (2004). Attractive banknotes. Keesing J. of Documents & Identity. 2004. Issue 9. Pp. 20–25 (in English).
  • Kyrychok, T. Yu., & Nesterenko, V. M. (2012). Analiz za metodom «vartist-efektyvnist» zastosuvannia tekhnolohii orlovskoho ofsetnoho druku dlia vyhotovlennia ukrainskoi hryvni: Naukovi zapysky [Ukrainskoi akademii drukarstva], 4 (41), 148–156 (in Ukrainian).
  • Kyrychok, T. Yu. (2014). Analiz napriamkiv pidvyshchennia znosostiikosti banknot: Tekh­nolohiia i tekhnika drukarstva, 3 (45), 4–19 (in Ukrainian).
  • Durniak, B. V., Pikh, I. V., & Semenivskyi, V. M. (2006). Systemnyi analiz ta optymizatsiia parametriv knyzhkovykh vydan : monohrafiia. Lviv : UAD (in Ukrainian).
  • Havenko, S., Kornilov, I., & Nychka, V. (1996). Systemnyi analiz i metody keruvannia yakistiu drukovanoi produktsii. Uzhhorod (in Ukrainian).
  • Havenko, S. F., & Melnykov, O. V. (2000). Otsinka yakosti polihrafichnoi produktsii. Lviv (in Ukrainian).
  • Melnykov, O. V. (2007). Tekhnolohiia ploskoho ofsetnoho druku. Lviv : Ukrainska akademiia drukarstva (in Ukrainian).
  • Pikh, I. V. (2003). Parametrychne prohnozuvannia yakosti drukovanoi produktsii: Kvalilohiia knyhy, 6, 200–213 (in Ukrainian).
  • Senkivska, N. Ye., Melnykov, O. V., & Senkivskyi, V. M. (2011). Iierarkhiia faktoriv dru­karskoho protsesu (na prykladi ploskoho ofsetnoho druku): Polihrafiia i vydavnycha sprava, 1 (53), 152–158 (in Ukrainian).
  • Senkivska, N. Ye. (2011). Syntez modeli faktoriv prohnozuvannia yakosti protsesu dru­ku­vannia (na prykladi ploskoho ofsetnoho druku): Kvalilohiia knyhy, 1 (19), 46–52 (in Ukrai­nian).
  • Truman, A. B., & Hudson, F. (1962). The rheological behavior of paper and ink in the offset print-ing process: Pulp and Paper Magazine of Canada, 6, T299–T306 (in English).
  • Aleksandrov, D. (1998). Sovremennye sredstva povysheniia kachestva ofsetnoi pechati. Sankt-Peterburg : Tekst (in Russian).
  • Romeikov, I. V., & Vladimirov, A. V. (1975). Graficheskie iskazheniia na ottiskakh ofsetnoi pechati: Nauchnye tr. po pech. Protcessam, II, 44–48 (in Russian).
  • Kajanto, I. M. Effect of formation on print quality: Interdependence between local grammage and print density. Paper presented at 24-th EUCEPA Conference 1990; Print held 8-11 1990 may at Sweden, Stockholm. Pp. 381–396 (in English).
  • Mettanen M. Aligned analysis of surface topography and printed dot pattern maps / M. Met­tanen, M. Lauri, H. Ihalainen, P. Kumpulainen. Pros. Papermaking Research Symposium. Kuopio, Finland, June 2009 (in English).
  • Fuping, Liu, & Wei, Shen. (2008). Forced wetting and dewetting of liquids on solid surfaces and their roles in offset printing: Colloids and Surfaces A: Physi-cochemical and Engineering Aspects, 316, 1–3. 5, 62–69 (in English).
  • Tag, C.-M., Pykonen, M., Rosenholm, J. B., & Backfol, K. (2009). Wettability of model foun­tain solutions: The influence on topo-chemical and -physical properties of offset paper: Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 330, 428–436 (in English).
  • Kyrychok, T. Yu. Naukovi osnovy zabezpechennia znosostiikosti banknotnoi produktsii : avto­ref. dys. d-ra tekhn. nauk: 05.05.01. Lviv, 2014. 45 s. (in Ukrainian).
  • Tekhnolohichne zabezpechennia yakosti banknot pid chas metalohrafichnoho druku : avtoref. dys. k-ta tekhn. nauk: 05.05.01 / Korotenko O. V.; NTUU «KPI im. I. Sikorskoho. Kyiv, 2018. 22 s. (in Ukrainian).
  • Kyrychok, T. Yu., & Klymenko, T. Ye. (2015). Systema zabezpechennia yakosti ofsetnoho druku: Tekhnolohiia i tekhnika drukarstva, 1, 18–23 (in Ukrainian).
  • Saati, T., & Kerns, K. (1991). Analiticheskoe planirovanie. Organizatciia sistem. Moskva : Ra­dio i sviaz (in Russian).
  • Saati, T. (1993). Priniatie reshenii. Metod analiza ierarkhii. Moskva : Radio i sviaz (in Rus­sian).
  • Saati, T. L. (2008). Priniatie reshenii pri zavisimostiakh i obratnykh sviaziakh: Analiticheskie seti. Moskva : Izd-vo LKI (in Russian).